ok, but you aren't actually disagreeing, you must realise - I'm saying that I will have that 'life', if you read my post, and more fun, during latter 2/3 of lifetime... what you are saying is that many people have a high income but do not trade it off against more leisure time in future because they spend it all. Well... I know they do that. Everybody knows they do that. If things go badly I will be able to retire in comfort at age 42, if they go well I will be able to retire in comfort at age 37... (feel free to doubt this, but I have had my calculations worked out for a long time and they are solid) I do actually have a nice life, although you may doubt it. Because I have tried to learn about building wealth, I am debt free, own a small house without mortgage already, a car, 3 holidays per year and hobbies... and I actually enjoy time with friends, who I don't pay to spend time with me. if you say this is not a life, you're entitled to that point of view. You prioritise the extra things you buy with the spare money I have learned to invest (and I am good at it: I have actually made money in 2008, unlike most people...) and I prioritise freedom from debt and from needing a job ten years from now... You might be right and I might look back with regret when I am 50 and have been retired for several years. I hope I can cope as I look across at other people working until 65+, filled with fun memories no doubt.Carpe diem is great. there is usually a trade off where you have to mortgage your future against the present, though. Using present as downpayment on future is much cheaper way around, if you understand how compounding works.