I'm a bit confused about the various job titles at different consultancies and how they compare. Although there are generally broad similarities between consultancies there are also some inconsistencies and sometimes I find it difficult to understand how positions at one company compare with another.So, I'll start. At KPMG the structure is basically as follows:E - Analyst (most junior position, first two or three years out of uni, generally doing tedious research work)D Consultant* (next 2-4 years, doing more interesting consulting work under supervision of managers and senior managers)C Manager (next 2-4 years, managing small to medium sized projects, some client relationship management responsibilities)B Senior Manager* (next 2-4 years, experienced consultants managing larger projects and with more business development and client relationship responsibilities).A Director (senior team manager with oversight of client relationship development, significant business development objectives and oversight of major projects. Participate in limited profit-share programme.)P Partner (sits on backside in nice office, gets paid a lot)*There are also people whose job titles are "Associate Manager" and "Associate Director". I think they fit in respectively at the top end of D-Grade and B-Grade, but I'm not entirely sure.By way of comparison, at my last company, which was a small boutique firm, the job progression (with approximate equivalents to the KPMG grades) went: Researcher (E) - Associate Consultant (E-D) - Consultant (D)- Senior Consultant (C) - Associate Director (B) - Director (A), then some heads of department/senior executives who I suppose were equivalent to partners (it wasn't a partnership, so the structure at senior levels was different). It would be interested to understand how the structure differs at other major consultancies.