Your girlfriend sounds like the archetypal nightmare candidate - no drive, no ambition, wants 'interesting' (i.e. get recruiters running themselves ragged to bring roles to the annointed queen while she sits on her ar*e and pontificates about whether the role 2 mins commute, with a 10K salary increase for a great client is sufficiently 'interesting'). RCs are not just about a 'fast buck' but about providing a service to their clients, and unforunately that involves identifying and securing rare, exceptional people for roles, not people with experience in an unknown firm, who could be as easily found by a client through running an advert in the local paper, and with no ambition. You say 'I am doing pretty well in my bean counting course so we're not going to be too pushed for money in the future' - fine; but when the client offers her £x I would put money on her suddenly demanding £y + z. Get real and tell your girlfriend to get real. If she wants to turn finding 'interesting' into a worthy cause, she should find a role direct as RCs/HH are busy people and - if I am being blunt(er) - back winning horses, not also rans, the lame, and those that really should never have made it past the knackers yard. I am not saying your GF is any of these things, but if she wants to find a rewarding role, whether direct or indirect, she needs to get with the programme, get some ambition/drive/flexibility, ditch the interesting angle as a filter (the market is slowing down don't you know?) and get a role which will give her prospects to do something interesting when she has the experience and track record to actually deliver interesting to the market by return.End of rant. Grrrr. Pet hates and all that.