I am no apologist for PRINCE2 - it's verbose and over-written in some areas and sparse in others where you could do with some padding.The whole argument seems to me very similar to when I was at school arguing about "O" level maths - why do I need to learn about quadratic equations when I just want to be able to count my change in the pub? Some employers regard a P2 qualification as short hand for something they're looking for.I, personally, doubt that this is true but I have taken the exams and have the certs.To clear up the qualification / requalification debate:The Foundation Exam consists of 75 multiple choice questions and is considered to display a basic understanding of the method. This never runs out.Passing the Practitioner exam (3 hour written paper) allows one to become a "Registered" P2 Practitioner and this "registration" lasts for 5 years. Following this, one can still claim to be a P2 Practitioner but not a registered one. To re-register, there is a written 1 hour exam, which consists of 1 of the questions from that day's Practitioner exam.From memory, this costs no more than the £150 (+VAT?) charge for the exam, covering invigilator time and marking. Not particularly expensive once every 5 years.I used www.the-pso.com to re-register as I'd come across them on an assignment. The bloke who runs it (no relation to me!) is Peter Weaver, ex-Army and ex-NHS and he is vg.P