Search:
search button
Software House Vs Big Consultancy
 
2 posts
21.11.6
Consultanguage Vol 2 - continued
 
2 posts
22.11.6
Deloitte strategy vs others
 
4 posts
22.11.6
Feedback from Interview - What to ask & improve?
 
7 posts
28.11.6
Luggage
 
8 posts
21.11.6
IB in big 4 or SC in boutique firm? First job ever...
 
2 posts
22.11.6
Deloitte Consultancy US
 
5 posts
27.11.6
How to find an organisation that matches me?
 
1 posts
19.11.6
Ego trips and cheap shots
 
15 posts
02.12.6
Best way to enter MC for engineers?
 
10 posts
24.11.6
Work-life balance in consultancy?
 
5 posts
22.11.6
Family Business into Consultancy
 
8 posts
23.11.6
Moving into Consultancy
 
3 posts
19.11.6
Oxford MBA looking for consultancy jobs
 
2 posts
18.11.6
To all the spell checkers
 
8 posts
19.11.6
Structuring Analysis - Help
 
3 posts
20.11.6
ACN - Operating Group or GSL?
 
1 posts
17.11.6
Consultancies assisting start ups
 
1 posts
17.11.6
Masters Choice
 
6 posts
17.11.6
Big Firm or Small Firm?
 
2 posts
20.11.6
snowball's chance in hell?
 
6 posts
21.11.6
OC&C Test
 
13 posts
29.11.6
Recruitment firms in the US?
 
1 posts
17.11.6
Moving from Accenture...
 
2 posts
17.11.6
Moving from BSI to Strategy?
 
6 posts
22.11.6
New Career in Consultancy
 
1 posts
16.11.6
Nottingham or Warwick?
 
4 posts
17.11.6
Do recruiters add value? ;)
 
6 posts
20.11.6
Deloitte Offer
 
6 posts
16.11.6
should I move to a niche firm?
 
6 posts
17.11.6
IQ Question
 
8 posts
16.11.6
Certified Management Consultant
 
3 posts
15.11.6
Are recruitment consultancies needed ?
 
11 posts
16.11.6
acn pay
 
9 posts
17.11.6
McKinsey Corporate Finance Summit
 
2 posts
19.11.6
Consulting assignments middle east
 
4 posts
19.11.6
CG senior consultant salary
 
1 posts
14.11.6
Playing with my niche
 
7 posts
19.11.6
Costs of traveling from overseas to interview
 
5 posts
16.11.6
Where is John McBride?
 
1 posts
14.11.6
bright or not bright future after MC?
 
4 posts
17.11.6
McKinsey v the Rest
 
6 posts
13.11.6
What is MBB's yield?
 
2 posts
13.11.6
Accenture Technology Solutions Interview for Technical Lead
 
1 posts
13.11.6
Corporate Strategy
 
10 posts
15.11.6
Go to strategy
 
8 posts
15.11.6
PA Interview
 
3 posts
13.11.6
Is a degree the only way into consultancy?
 
2 posts
12.11.6
Accenture operating groups
 
5 posts
13.11.6
utilisation and benchtime
 
3 posts
13.11.6
 

McKinsey v the Rest

 
forum comment
#0 McKinsey v the Rest
 
Boxershorts
13.11.6 00:00
 
After enjoying and participating in a number of discussions on this forum, I've noticed a general trend (with a few noatable exceptions) that working at McK, Bain, BCG, etc. is the be-all-and-end-all.The opinion seems to be that if you don't (a) work for one of these or (b) have ambitions to work for one of them, you really don't have a prayer or a clue and that your life is basically not worth living.As a reasonably experienced consultant (c. 10 years), I've worked with some quality people in diverse industries (MC, IB, PE, telecomms, software dev, broadcast media, sports management). Some of these folks are at board level in substantial companies (100K staff, NP 3Bn Euro are sizeable companies IMO!)These are hugely successful people, running serious organisations. Yet - and here's the rub - I've never, to my knowledge, met anyone among them who worked for McK, Bain, BCG, etc.I have, on one occasion come across an ex-McK consultant (left to set up his own firm). He was rather ordinary.So, why is it that McK and the like are put on a pedestal?Let the games begin ...
 
Reply

Reply

 
 
forum comment
#0 RE: McKinsey v the Rest
 
Anon
13.11.6 00:00
 
I disagree that there is a trend towards MBB being the "be-all-and-end-all". If anything, whenever someone suggests it on this forum there is someone willing to disagree. Even those who aspire to working for MBB rarely believe that there aren't other people who are driven by different things and have different aspirations.If there is any trend, it is simply that the majority of forum users are looking at entry level positions, and those looking at MBB positions tend to need a lot of help.I don't work for MBB but I work with ex-MBB consultants and alongside plenty of them on our bigger consulting engagements. There are plenty of smart people among them, but also a fair share of analysts who don't understand what "strategy" means, consultants who haven't heard of SOX and partners who can't use a computer, and they cause exactly the same irritations as you'd find at Bloggs & Co. niche consultancies.I posit that MBB have good market brands, strong cultures, and extensive alumni networks, which contribute to compelling employer brands. However, there are other firms and careers that have better employee value propositions.We work in a complex market even for the services sector where value creation is based on intangibles and difficult to quantify. Two characteristics of a good management consultant are that they are comfortable with ambiguity and change, but that they are also able to create an insightful, lucid narrative out of apparent chaos.When people come to us, asking "what do management consultants do?", we find it relatively easier to paint a powerful, simplified picture. We depict linear value chains and linear market structures - with strategy at one end and implentation at the other.At the same time, we have taken a military concept - of strategy - and plugged into it all the complicated, difficult and often uncomfortable "ideas" so that is no longer meaningful in its aggregate form.There is hardly any wonder that both clients and newcomers to our industry seize on the thing that is most familiar and accessible - the idea of hierarchies. Even as experienced consultants who know that consulting does not share common attributes with other businesses (such as economies of scale) we find it comforting to feel like we can "normalise" our work and our careers. Therefore, we perpetuate convenient myths.There are, of course, advantages to going through all this. Not only are there pschological benefits, but we can also sell our work and ourselves to clients better.The danger of going too far down this road is that we don't learn from history. In some ways, we are trailing the legal industry by a few decades in the way the industry is maturing. Law also deals with ambiguity and needs to translate shades of "right" and "wrong" into simple indications so that their clients can understand where they stand. Legal firms created the "magic circle", and we can now see where that has brought them.
 
Reply

Reply

 
 
forum comment
#0 RE: RE: McKinsey v the Rest
 
Boxershorts
13.11.6 00:00
 
Hi Anon,Agree that I may have exaggerated slightly. I was trying to be deliberately provocative - devil's advocate and all that good stuff - to get some sort of debate going.Yet I do see a strong tendency of folks wanting to get into the McK's of this world, etc. and eschewing any other firms and opportunities as being not good enough. Curiosity strikes. Why?Thanks for your reasoned comments. Interested to hear what others think.
 
Reply

Reply

 
 
forum comment
#0 RE: McKinsey v the Rest
 
One example
13.11.6 00:00
 
I think I read somewhere that the Strategy Director at the Virgin Group is ex-McK (10 years there). That must be an interesting firm to work for...
 
Reply

Reply

 
 
forum comment
#0 RE: RE: McKinsey v the Rest
 
One example
13.11.6 00:00
 
Here's the man: Gordon McCallumhttp://www.ntl.com/mediacentre/whoswho/ntlboard/mccallum.asp5 years at McK... and I meant in the post above that Virgin would be the interesting company rather than McK ;)
 
Reply

Reply

 
 
forum comment
#0 RE: RE: RE: McKinsey v the Rest
 
dl
13.11.6 00:00
 
Well. They (MBB) have the brand name, the alumni network, the outplacement services and can (generally) pick the "best" people from schools and universities.Particularly if one is keen on using consultancy as a launching pad for a career somewhere else, it's understandable that MBB are appealing.Be-all and end-all? Don't think so. There's plenty of consultancies that produce work of quality that is perfectly comparable or higher, but haven't got the widespread reputation. It's a bit like saying that Audi, BMW and Mercedes are the only companies able to make a decent car...
 
Reply

Reply

 
Return to the top of page.

ThreadID: 0