Sorry guys, but I feel the true point is being missed by the majority. This guy or girl has lied on his CV. This means that he is taking the place of someone else who is honest. This honest person - who most likely had lower than expected A-level results might very well have worked hard to achieve in other areas - extra curricular areas - and applied in the hope that they would make a good impresion on the recuiter. Now assuming a quota on the number of applicants invited to a second interview, Anon has quite likely taken the place of an applicant who deserved it.Perhaps I am in the minority - but I see this as fundamentally wrong. Regardless of whether it "matters" to the firm - the basic premise is that Anon has LIED to get a position. What does this say about what he/she will do in the future? It's absolutely disgraceful and if Anon has an ounce of professional integrity he should withdraw now.Even submitting the "correct" CV now - the major point that the first stage - the "selection" stage is passed, has been missed. Someone, maybe one of you guys reading this forum, has NOT reached the second stage because of Anon.This is the sort of attitude that, and I am being totally serious, if widely enough permiated, causes disasters such as Enron. Some may say "well it's only an A-level grade" and tell me to "relax - this is what happens in business". I disagree - and I fundamentally believe that even though stretching the truth, creating an "image" can get you far - we, as Consultancy professionals, should draw the line at a blatant lie.