What constitutes a 'good role' then?PE firms are essentially M&A environments, they dont have trading rooms like Funds do. The point of a Fund is to flip investments rapidly to generate returns, whereas a PE fund is slower, much more DD orientated. Look at the M&A division of an IB and roll this out a little and you are essentially there, except that whereas the IB is a broker model, the PE is a primary investor. The value of consultants coming across lies either in turnaround to maximise returns, and they are often the appointed observer on the board, or to do the DD stuff - its when coming across to do this that MCs struggle more, as MC lends itself more to a lateral understanding of business mechanics, enough to correlate certain improvement techniques; IB background are more vertical and narrow, lending themselves to analysis without a wider operational picture. The former is better for Big 4 (and is the vogue at present) the latter MBB types.