The original poster seems to be concentrating on the belief that they will achieve an adequate return on the investment they make in an MBA. At least one subsequent poster has advised that this is quite unlikely when properly quantified. The problem most people have is that they do not seem to be able to properly quantify the ROI and the real pay-back period. Firstly to be realistic you must use a discounted cash flow basis. You then must take your net income position prior to being awarded an MBA, and compare the difference between that and what you earn net afterwards on a marginal basis. You must include the effect of fiscal drag, loss of income tax relief and the loss of net earnings over the course period. You must deduct all costs including travelling, academic costs, books, subsistance etc. You must then compute the whole position on a discounted cash flow basis, to detemine the true payback period. It is only after that period that you can look at any real yield. Most individuals who do this properly find that they will never make any true yield in net financial terms from investment in an MBA. In fact the business schools for this reason spin the results which they give, selecting only entrants who were on very low reward packages prior to the course, and not using discounted cash flow or considering a payback period, to attempt to demonstrate a supposed yield from doing their course. Some of them have been censured for this eroneous practice in the past, such as by the ASA. The only real way to achieve a guaranteed true ROI is to get a consultancy to sponsor you. There are some who do this in the UK. Usually you will need to join them first and work for them for a year or two before they will do this.