I take it you refering to the consulting division created by Arthur Andersen and not Andersen Consulting which today is Accenture, resulting from the split between Arthur Andersen and Andersen Consulting in the late 90's. This scenario provides highlights both extremes of the scale. Andersen Business Consulting which we all now what happened resulting from the Enron fall-out. In the flip side you have Accenture, which has grown into this monster from initially a small business unit within Arthur Andersen. As someone who has previously worked for Accenture, or Andersen Consulting as it was in those days and now works for one of the so called fast growing firms, I am currently seriously considering EY as an option given the opportunities to be be involved in building a new-age consulting firm. Your comment about concerns about the same thing happening in EY as it has in other consultancies given the people that have nmoved to EY is valid, but on the flip side, anyone who has significant experience in consulting knows the issues and thus know how to avoid making the same mistakes with a new venture, since there are no constraints with existing infrastructure which will allow for a more streamlined approach.