Hi Tony – you’ve been consistent for a while now in saying that a great proportion of hiring is driven by need to replace as a result of worsening attrition. Are there any suggestions as to why attrition is so bad? Given the relatively high cost of recruiting (fees, training, initial bench time etc) why are firms not focussing more on maintaining their existing staff morale and retention?Is high attrition now an inherent part of an industry that has become increasingly short termist? (more IT body-shopping, more off-shoring and outsourcing, more up-or-out, grade/role dilution, more working like a dog)?As Diane in Cheers once said “Anyone with anything intelligent and insightful to contribute to this conversation, join me in the pool room” (Pause) “Okay, anyone with a two-bit, half-assed opinion on this, join me in the pool room”