Hi Alex,I don't disagree withyour clarifications. My observations are:1) Clearly a top-tier MBA increases your chances. Maybe that is from c.0% to c.30%, I don't know, and obviously there are countless variables at work and a big range around that 30. Some other guy might jump from 0% to 30%, while I may go from 10% to 20%.2) Whether that jump is worthwhile depends on the individual and their ambitions/goals. Many people really really want to work at an MBB firm and so will happily give it a shot. Others really want, or perhaps would quite like, to work at an MBB firm but aren't prepared to take the financial/personal risk of the MBA - that's up to them.. 3) What amuses me (a bit) is when people in this second 'risk-averse' group (and calling them that is a massive generalization, I know) harp on and on that they are just as good as the people from the top-tier schools, and that despite never going to business school, or attending a lesser school, they continually outperform the Harvard MBA. In many cases I am sure they are right - there were plenty of idiots at my school, and I am sure plenty of my peers think I am an idiot. But this misses the point of top tier schools, which is that they give you a shot, even if you are an idiot4) Your chances are increased, not so much because of what the top-tier MBA teaches you, but because it puts you in the sights of MBB, or Goldman Sachs or Google, or whoever, and it makes hiring you easy, cheap and relatively low risk for them - they know what they are getting in 95ish% of cases, and the other 5ish% are expensive, but not for long.