My perspective. Entrepreneurs are, by definition, risk takers. Large organizations, often beholden to public shareholders are extremely risk averse - in line with the pension funds they serve! Public organizations advising other public organizations doubly so. So when you talk about innovation abd entrepreneurship within Consultancy, it's not "true" entrepreneurship, it's not "true" innovation. It's tried and tested innovation and it's SOX-compliant entrepreneurship - which may seem slightly oxymoronic.However I don't agree that Consultancy requires a different skill-set to that required by an "entrepreneur". In fact I would see (from my personal perspective) many shared traits. The ability to be able to take a risk on a new concept - by "selling" that concepts; the ability to take a risk from waking into a cold-meeting with a client with a poorly defined brief; the ability to sell yourself and take risks in new ventures, new projects, new postings.The "Google" type entrepreneurship is, I would see, more about eschewing the corporate constraints, about true accountability for failure and about feeling "true" ownership. I would say there is, indeed, a middle ground even in the Corporate world for entrepreneurs.