I do agree with everything, especially the anti-american sentiment : )I am not Anglo-Saxon either, I have bilingual proficiency for two languages and sufficient-for-business-level for other three.I totally understand that the critique to the tone of my delivery, but if you take away the crap (one has to have fun one way or another and sure I'm not the least useful participant on this forum!), what remains is1 - MOST (80%?) big international players (20k+ employees?) in professional services (management consulting, big4 "consulting", IT consulting) do have strong international presence exactly to cover all markets without unnecessary crossborder travel and taxation issues (ever tried to send consultants in Norway or Switzerland?).This translates into Italian firms recruiting Italian people, Polish firms recruiting Polish people, French firms recruiting French people. There is some slack in this given the fact that most European nationals can move to another EU country and work there with basically no further complications for the employer than a national would entail. Unluckily for you this does not apply to people from outside the EU, hence the recent sharp in international sponsorships from UK firms to AU, US etc people.I'll concede that an Accenture type of firm might be more flexible about this because they don't have that legacy attitude Big4s have due to their accounting/legal side.2 - Languages are a fantastic thing and I'd even dare to say you are worth a person for every language you speak fluently. But they are not as important as people think in the type of firms specified in point#1 of this reply. Again, back to the case of VicCharlotte, I don't think his/her fluency in Spanish is a particular advantage if he/she wanted to apply for a London office of a firm. UK partners/directors of a Big4 firm mostly sell work which will be delivered by English speaking people to English speaking clients. Esceptions are very rare. The diversity that was mentioned is mainly with the junior levels and, again, mostly regards EU nationalities that do not bring significant additional bureaucratic hassle. It dies out as the ranks go up.Tom1, your figure alone is irrelevant. What percentage of yearly sales does it represent? Would a local contractor have covered the language just as well without requiring a fulltime employee to have that skill?Despite their supposedly international "flare", I'd say that only 5% of the work done by Big4 consultancies is international and needs languages other than English (might be a bit higher for US practices). Make that 25% for an Accenture type of firm (and again, one thing is intra-EU work, one thing is the rest) and maybe 50% for MBB (especially UK and US offices, but there again they always work at CXO level so everyone speaks English anyway). These are all gut-feeling stats coming from 3 years with a Big4 in London and many contacts/friends working for MBBs or Big4s or big IT consultancies in the UK, US and EU.To conclude, back to the point of VicCharlotte1 - Languages are a lovely thing in general, but as more and more people can speak English, their importance when it comes to work is decreasing, especially West European languages2 - Fleuncy in Spanish does not bring a significant advantage when applying to the UK office of a big international professional services firm (it could be different if you applied to the Madrid office or to a Spanish firm with strong presence in the UK e.g. Santander?)3 - Not having a EU passport does bring a significant disadvantage when applying to the UK office of a big international professional services firmYou do the maths.